Murdaugh: Death in the Family Movie Review (2025) – A Gripping True-Crime Drama or Sensationalized Tragedy?

Murdaugh: Death in the Family Movie Review (2025) – A Gripping True-Crime Drama or Sensationalized Tragedy?

In 2025, the true-crime genre takes a bold leap with Murdaugh: Death in the Family, a film that dives into one of the most shocking and convoluted legal sagas in modern American history. Directed by an acclaimed filmmaker and backed by meticulous research, this movie promises to unravel the layers of power, corruption, and family secrets that surrounded the Murdaugh dynasty. But does it deliver justice to the real-life victims, or does it risk exploiting their tragedy for entertainment?

With true-crime documentaries and dramatizations dominating streaming platforms, audiences are hungry for stories that blend mystery, scandal, and real-world stakes. The Murdaugh case—with its unsolved murders, financial fraud, and a once-respected legal family’s downfall—offers all the ingredients for a compelling narrative. Yet, the challenge lies in balancing respect for the victims with the demand for gripping storytelling.

In this Murdaugh: Death in the Family movie review (2025), we’ll explore the film’s approach to the source material, its cinematic execution, and whether it succeeds as both a dramatic retelling and a thoughtful examination of systemic failures. We’ll also discuss its potential impact on the true-crime genre and why this story resonates so deeply in today’s cultural landscape.

Understanding the Murdaugh Case: A Real-Life Southern Gothic Tragedy

Before diving into the Murdaugh: Death in the Family movie review, it’s essential to grasp the real events that inspired it. The Murdaugh family, a legal dynasty in South Carolina’s Lowcountry, became synonymous with scandal after a series of shocking events:

  • The Boat Crash (2019): Paul Murdaugh, the youngest son of prominent attorney Alex Murdaugh, was involved in a fatal boat accident that killed 19-year-old Mallory Beach. Paul faced charges but was killed before the trial.
  • The Murders at Moselle (2021): Alex Murdaugh’s wife, Maggie, and son Paul were found shot to death at their hunting estate. Alex was later convicted of their murders in a highly publicized trial.
  • Financial Fraud Uncovered: Investigations revealed Alex had stolen millions from clients, including wrongful death settlements, to fund his opioid addiction and lavish lifestyle.
  • A Web of Deception: The case exposed corruption within the local legal system, with allegations of evidence tampering, police misconduct, and a culture of impunity for the powerful.

The Murdaugh saga is a labyrinth of crime, privilege, and unchecked power—making it a perfect, if morally complex, subject for a true-crime film. But how does Death in the Family handle this delicate material?

Murdaugh: Death in the Family Movie Review – Does It Do Justice to the Truth?

Narrative Structure: A Non-Linear Approach

The film adopts a non-linear storytelling technique, jumping between the 2021 murders, the boat crash, and Alex Murdaugh’s eventual downfall. This choice mirrors the fragmented way the public learned about the case—through leaked documents, courtroom revelations, and media speculation. While this approach heightens suspense, it risks confusing viewers unfamiliar with the timeline.

For true-crime enthusiasts, the piecing-together of events will feel rewarding, almost like solving a puzzle. However, casual viewers might struggle to follow the coections between the boat crash, the murders, and the financial crimes. A brief introductory montage or text summary could have helped ground the narrative.

Performances: Capturing the Murdaughs’ Complexity

The casting is one of the film’s strongest assets. The actor portraying Alex Murdaugh delivers a chilling performance, oscillating between charm and desperation. His portrayal avoids outright villainy, instead presenting Alex as a man consumed by addiction, greed, and the weight of his family’s legacy. This nuance is crucial—it prevents the film from becoming a simple morality tale.

Maggie and Paul Murdaugh are given emotional depth, particularly in flashbacks that humanize them beyond their roles as victims. Maggie’s quiet strength and Paul’s reckless privilege are portrayed with sensitivity, ensuring the film doesn’t reduce them to plot devices.

Cinematography: The Lowcountry as a Character

The film’s visual style is a standout. The sweltering South Carolina Lowcountry—with its Spanish moss, murky rivers, and decaying grandeur—becomes a character in its own right. The cinematography leans into Southern Gothic aesthetics, using golden-hour lighting to contrast with the darkness of the crimes. Wide shots of the Murdaughs’ hunting estate, Moselle, emphasize isolation and inevitability, as if the land itself is complicit in the family’s downfall.

One particularly striking sequence recreates the boat crash using handheld camera work and disorienting sound design, immersing viewers in the chaos of that night. It’s a bold choice that pays off, making the tragedy feel visceral rather than distant.

Accuracy vs. Dramatization: Where Does the Film Take Liberties?

True-crime films always walk a tightrope between factual accuracy and dramatic license. Death in the Family largely stays faithful to the known facts, but it does take some creative liberties:

  • Composite Characters: Some minor figures in the case are merged or fictionalized to streamline the narrative. While this is a common technique, purists might find it jarring.
  • Speculative Dialogue: Private conversations, such as those between Alex and his late father, are invented. These scenes are clearly labeled as dramatic interpretations, but they still shape the audience’s perception of events.
  • Emotional Embellishments: The film amplifies certain moments—for example, Alex’s breakdown during a courtroom scene—based on witness accounts but not direct evidence. These choices heighten tension but blur the line between fact and fiction.

For viewers seeking a purely factual retelling, the film might feel too speculative. However, as a dramatic exploration of themes like power and corruption, it succeeds admirably.

Why the Murdaugh Case Resonates Today: Themes of Power and Justice

The Murdaugh story isn’t just a salacious scandal—it’s a reflection of broader societal issues. The film leans into these themes, making it more than just a true-crime spectacle.

1. The Corruption of Power

The Murdaugh family’s influence in Hampton County, South Carolina, was absolute. For decades, they controlled the local legal system, with Alex’s father, grandfather, and great-grandfather all serving as solicitors (prosecutors). The film highlights how this unchecked power allowed misconduct to go unchallenged for generations.

One of the most chilling scenes depicts Alex casually walking into a police station after the murders, only to be treated with deference by officers who knew him personally. It’s a stark reminder of how systemic corruption enables individual crimes.

2. The Human Cost of Addiction

Alex Murdaugh’s opioid addiction is a central thread in the film. Rather than portraying him as a mustache-twirling villain, the movie shows how his substance abuse fueled his financial crimes and erratic behavior. This approach humanizes him without excusing his actions—a delicate balance that the film mostly maintains.

A particularly harrowing sequence depicts Alex’s withdrawal in jail, intercut with flashbacks to his pill-popping days. It’s a brutal but necessary inclusion, underscoring how addiction can destroy lives beyond the addict’s own.

3. Media Sensationalism and Public Perception

The film doesn’t shy away from critiquing the media’s role in the Murdaugh saga. Scenes of news vans swarming the courthouse and pundits speculating on Alex’s guilt mirror the real-life media frenzy. This meta-commentary invites viewers to question their own consumption of true-crime content.

At one point, a journalist character remarks, “This isn’t just a story—it’s a feeding frenzy.” It’s a line that lingers, forcing the audience to confront the ethics of turning real-life tragedy into entertainment.

4. The Failures of the Legal System

Perhaps the film’s most damning critique is reserved for the legal system that allowed the Murdaughs to operate with impunity. Through courtroom scenes and expository dialogue, the movie illustrates how wealth and coections can delay justice—sometimes indefinitely.

The film’s climax, which recreates Alex’s murder trial, is a masterclass in tension. Even viewers who know the outcome will find themselves gripping their seats as the prosecution methodically dismantles Alex’s alibi. It’s a testament to the power of the legal system when it finally works—as well as a reminder of how often it fails.

How Death in the Family Stacks Up Against Other True-Crime Dramas

The true-crime genre has seen a renaissance in recent years, with films and series like The Night Of, I, Tonya, and The Staircase setting high standards. How does Murdaugh: Death in the Family compare?

Strengths:

  • Depth of Research: The filmmakers clearly did their homework, incorporating court transcripts, interviews, and investigative reports into the script. This attention to detail lends the film an air of authenticity.
  • Balanced Portrayal: Unlike some true-crime dramas that glorify criminals, this film refuses to romanticize Alex Murdaugh. He is neither a hero nor a monster but a flawed, broken man.
  • Atmospheric Tension: The Southern Gothic setting is used to perfection, creating an oppressive, almost mythic atmosphere that lingers long after the credits roll.

Weaknesses:

  • Pacing Issues: The non-linear structure, while ambitious, occasionally disrupts the flow. Some viewers might find the timeline jumps confusing.
  • Underdeveloped Side Characters: Figures like the Beach family (victims of the boat crash) and the housekeeper Gloria Satterfield (who died in a suspicious fall at the Murdaugh home) are given less screen time than they deserve. Their stories are crucial to understanding the full scope of the Murdaughs’ crimes.
  • Ambiguous Ending: The film’s final moments are deliberately open-ended, leaving some threads unresolved. While this might frustrate viewers seeking closure, it reflects the reality that many questions in the Murdaugh case remain unanswered.

Overall, Death in the Family holds its own against other true-crime dramas. It may not reach the heights of Zodiac in terms of procedural precision or The Social Network in snappy dialogue, but it carves out its owiche as a haunting meditation on power and its consequences.

The Ethics of True-Crime Storytelling: Does This Film Cross a Line?

No discussion of Murdaugh: Death in the Family would be complete without addressing the ethical concerns surrounding true-crime entertainment. The Murdaugh case involved real victims—Maggie and Paul Murdaugh, Mallory Beach, Gloria Satterfield—and their families are still grieving. Does this film exploit their pain, or does it serve a greater purpose?

Arguments for the Film’s Value

  • Raising Awareness: The Murdaugh case exposed systemic failures in the legal system, particularly in small towns where power is concentrated in a few families. The film shines a light on these issues, potentially sparking conversations about reform.
  • Honoring the Victims: By giving Maggie, Paul, and other victims screen time and emotional depth, the film ensures they are not forgotten. Their stories are central to the narrative, not just footnotes.
  • Educational Value: For viewers unfamiliar with the case, the film serves as an accessible primer on the events, complete with historical context about the Murdaugh dynasty’s influence.

Arguments Against the Film’s Approach

  • Profit from Tragedy: True-crime films are big business, and some may argue that monetizing real-life suffering is inherently unethical, regardless of the film’s intentions.
  • Re-Traumatization: For the victims’ families, seeing their loved ones’ deaths dramatized on screen could be painful. The filmmakers claim to have consulted with some family members, but not all may feel represented fairly.
  • Sensationalism: While the film avoids outright exploitation, certain scenes—such as the boat crash recreation—could be seen as gratuitous, prioritizing shock value over substance.

Ultimately, the ethics of Death in the Family may come down to intent and execution. The filmmakers have stated that their goal was to spark dialogue about justice and accountability. If viewers engage with those themes rather than treating the story as mere entertainment, the film could justify its existence.

Final Verdict: Is Murdaugh: Death in the Family Worth Watching?

So, should you add Murdaugh: Death in the Family to your watchlist? The answer depends on what you’re looking for in a true-crime film.

Watch It If:

  • You’re fascinated by complex, real-life legal sagas with layers of intrigue.
  • You appreciate films that blend Southern Gothic atmosphere with sharp social commentary.
  • You want a nuanced portrayal of crime that avoids black-and-white morality.
  • You’re interested in the psychological unraveling of a powerful figure.

Skip It If:

  • You prefer true-crime stories with clear-cut resolutions and heroes.
  • You’re sensitive to depictions of violence, addiction, or systemic corruption.
  • You dislike non-linear storytelling or ambiguous endings.
  • You believe true-crime films inherently exploit real-life victims.

For true-crime aficionados, Death in the Family is a must-watch. It’s a well-crafted, thought-provoking film that respects its subject matter while delivering the tension and drama audiences crave. For casual viewers, it may feel dense or unsettling—but that’s also a testament to its refusal to sugarcoat the truth.

Rating: 4/5 – A gripping, atmospheric true-crime drama that balances entertainment with ethical responsibility, though not without its flaws.

Where to Watch and What to Read Next

As of 2025, Murdaugh: Death in the Family is available on major streaming platforms, including:

  • Netflix (for subscribers)
  • Amazon Prime Video (available for rent or purchase)
  • HBO Max (included with subscription)

If you’re eager to dive deeper into the Murdaugh case, consider these resources:

  • Books:
    • The Murdaugh Dynasty: Power, Greed, and Justice in the South by Mandy Matney
    • Lowcountry: Murder, Money, and the Rise and Fall of a Legal Dynasty by Liz Farrell
  • Documentaries:
    • Murdaugh Murders: A Southern Scandal (HBO)
    • The Fall of the House of Murdaugh (Netflix)
  • Podcasts:
    • Murdaugh Murders Podcast (hosted by Mandy Matney)
    • Court Junkie (episodes covering the trial)

Related: True-Crime Documentaries to Watch in 2025

See also: The Psychology of True-Crime Obsession

Conclusion: A Haunting Reflection on Power and Justice

Murdaugh: Death in the Family is more than just a true-crime movie—it’s a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power, the fragility of justice, and the human cost of addiction. While it may not be perfect, it succeeds in making audiences think critically about the systems that allow such tragedies to unfold.

In an era where true crime is often consumed as disposable entertainment, this film stands out for its willingness to grapple with difficult questions. It doesn’t offer easy answers, but it does demand that we pay attention—and that might be the most important thing a true-crime story can do.

Whether you’re a longtime follower of the Murdaugh case or new to the story, this film will leave you with plenty to discuss. Just remember: behind every dramatic scene is a real person whose life was cut short. Their stories deserve to be heard—but they also deserve our respect.

Your Turn: What Did You Think?

Have you seen Murdaugh: Death in the Family? Did it change your perspective on the case, or did it feel like exploitation? Share your thoughts in the comments below—and if you haven’t watched it yet, stream it today and join the conversation.

For more true-crime reviews and deep dives, subscribe to our newsletter and never miss an update on the stories that matter.