The Cal Football Coaching Job: Money, Realignment, and the Odd Reality of 2024

In the ever-shifting landscape of college football, few coaching jobs are as intriguing—and as complicated—as the one at the University of California, Berkeley. The Cal football coaching job isn’t just about Xs and Os or recruiting five-star talent. It’s a high-stakes puzzle of financial constraints, conference realignment chaos, and an uncertain future in a sport where stability is a luxury. Whether you’re a die-hard Golden Bears fan, a coaching candidate weighing opportunities, or just a college football observer, understanding the layers of this job is critical.

With recent moves like Cal’s impending departure from the Pac-12 to the ACC in 2024, the program faces a crossroads. Can a new coach navigate the money questions plaguing the athletic department while competing in a conference that stretches from California to Florida? And what does this odd realignment reality mean for the long-term viability of Cal football? Let’s break it down.

—

Why the Cal Football Coaching Job Is One of the Most Unique in College Football

The Cal football head coaching position has always been a double-edged sword. On one hand, it’s a Power Five job with access to elite West Coast talent, a historic program, and one of the most prestigious academic institutions in the world. On the other, it’s a role burdened by budgetary limitations, facilities that lag behind peers, and now, a bizarre geographic misalignment thanks to conference realignment.

Here’s why this job stands out—and why it’s not for the faint of heart.

The Money Problem: A Budget That Doesn’t Match the Ambition

Let’s start with the elephant in the room: Cal’s athletic department is broke. In 2023, reports surfaced that the university was facing a $440 million deficit in its athletic department, a staggering figure even by Power Five standards. While football isn’t solely to blame—Cal sponsors 30 varsity sports, more than any other Power Five school—the program’s struggles on the field have exacerbated financial woes.

Unlike powerhouses like Alabama or Ohio State, where football revenues subsidize the entire athletic department, Cal’s program operates on a tighter budget. The lack of a modern, revenue-generating stadium (Memorial Stadium, while historic, seats just 63,000 and lacks the luxury suites and premium seating of newer venues) and mediocre attendance (averaging around 35,000 fans in recent years) mean fewer dollars flowing in.

For a new coach, this translates to:

Lower assistant coach salaries compared to competitors, making it harder to retain top-tier coordinators.
Limited resources for facilities upgrades, which are critical for recruiting in the NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) era.
Pressure to win immediately—because without on-field success, the financial hole only deepens.

The Realignment Reality: From the Pac-12 to the ACC—Without a Map

If the money issues weren’t enough, Cal’s move to the ACC in 2024 adds another layer of complexity. On paper, the ACC is a Power Five conference with a strong football tradition, but the logistics are… questionable.

Geographically, Cal will be the westernmost team in the ACC, with its closest conference rival (Stanford) also making the jump. Road trips to Florida State, Clemson, or Miami aren’t just long—they’re logistical nightmares for student-athletes, fans, and recruiting. Imagine trying to sell a high school prospect in Southern California on regular cross-country flights for conference games.

Then there’s the competitive challenge. The ACC isn’t the Pac-12. While the Pac-12 has struggled in recent years, the ACC features pereial contenders like Clemson and Florida State, as well as rising programs like Louisville and NC State. Cal hasn’t finished ranked in the AP Top 25 since 2015—can a new coach reverse that trend in a tougher conference?

The silver lining? The ACC’s media rights deal (worth about $20-30 million aually per school) is more stable than the Pac-12’s collapsing TV contract. But that money won’t fully offset the costs of travel or the challenges of recruiting against East Coast powerhouses.

The Academic Prestige: A Double-Edged Sword

Cal is one of the top public universities in the world, and that matters—but not always in the way you’d think. For coaches, the academic reputation is a selling point for certain recruits (especially those prioritizing degrees), but it also means:

Higher admission standards, which can limit the pool of eligible athletes.
A different type of recruit: Cal isn’t going to out-bid Alabama for five-star skill players, but it can attract high-academic, high-character players who might thrive in a pro-style system.
A unique culture: Berkeley is a progressive, politically active campus. A coach must navigate that environment carefully.

Former coach Justin Wilcox (fired in 2023 after seven seasons) leaned into the academic angle, but his teams struggled to compete at a high level. The next coach will need to balance football success with Cal’s academic identity—no easy task.

—

What It Takes to Succeed as Cal’s Next Head Coach

Given the challenges, what does the ideal candidate for the Cal football coaching job look like? History suggests a few key traits:

1. A Proven Offensive Mind (Because Defense Isn’t Enough)

Wilcox was a defensive specialist, and while his units were often solid, Cal’s offense ranked 120th nationally in scoring in 2023. In today’s college football landscape, you can’t win without points. The next coach must bring an iovative offensive system—whether it’s an air raid, spread, or pro-style attack—that can maximize Cal’s talent and keep up in the ACC.

Example: Look at what Jeff Tedford (Cal’s coach from 2002–2012) did with Aaron Rodgers. Tedford’s offensive schemes made Cal relevant, proving that the right system can elevate the program.

2. West Coast Recruiting Prowess

Cal’s lifeblood is California high school football. With USC and UCLA now in the Big Ten, there’s an opening to reclaim top in-state talent. The next coach must:

Build strong relationships with SoCal and NorCal high school coaches.
Leverage NIL collectives (like the Bear Market NIL) to compete for four- and five-star recruits.
Sell the vision of developing NFL talent—Cal has produced first-round picks like Rodgers, Marshawn Lynch, and Keenan Allen, but recent draft classes have been thin.

3. A CEO Mentality (Because This Job Is More Than Football)

The next Cal coach won’t just be a football strategist—they’ll need to be a fundraiser, a PR expert, and a cultural leader. With the athletic department’s financial struggles, the coach must:

Work closely with boosters and NIL donors to increase revenue streams.
Engage with the fanbase to boost attendance and merchandise sales.
Navigate the political and social landscape of Berkeley, which isn’t always football-friendly.

Think of it like ruing a startup: the product (the team) has to be great, but you also have to sell the vision to investors (donors), employees (players), and customers (fans).

4. Adaptability to the ACC’s Style

The Pac-12 was known for its finesse, up-tempo offenses and undersized but speedy defenses. The ACC? Not so much. Teams like Clemson and Florida State thrive on physicality, dominant defensive lines, and power ruing games.

Cal’s next coach must either:

Build a roster that can compete in the trenches (easier said than done with West Coast recruiting).
Develop a scheme that neutralizes the ACC’s strengths (e.g., a spread offense that forces defenses to cover the entire field).

—

The Biggest Obstacles Facing the Next Cal Coach

Even with the right hire, the road ahead is rocky. Here are the three biggest hurdles the next coach will face:

1. The Facility Arms Race

Cal’s Memorial Stadium is iconic but outdated. Meanwhile, competitors like Oregon (with its $68 million football performance center) and USC (with its private jet for recruiting) are lapping the Bears in the facilities race.

Without major upgrades, Cal will struggle to:

Impress recruits on campus visits.
Retain top assistants who can earn more elsewhere.
Compete with ACC programs that have state-of-the-art training facilities.

2. The Travel Nightmare

Playing in the ACC means cross-country flights for conference games. For example:

Cal at Florida State: 2,700 miles (vs. ~400 miles to Stanford in the Pac-12).
Cal at Boston College: 2,700 miles.
Cal at Miami: 2,600 miles.

This isn’t just a logistical issue—it’s a competitive disadvantage. Fatigued teams perform worse, and recruits (and their families) won’t love the idea of constant travel.

3. The Win-Now Pressure

Cal isn’t a program that can afford a three-year rebuild. With the athletic department’s financial struggles, the next coach will likely be on a short leash. If the team doesn’t show immediate improvement, the administration may panic—and that could lead to another coaching change, further destabilizing the program.

History shows that Cal doesn’t have patience:

Jeff Tedford was fired after a 3-9 season in 2012 (despite previous success).
Soy Dykes was let go after four seasons (with a 19-30 record).
Justin Wilcox lasted seven years but was dismissed after back-to-back 4-8 seasons.

—

Who Could Be the Right Fit for Cal?

Given the challenges, who might thrive in Berkeley? Here are a few realistic candidates (as of 2024) and why they could—or couldn’t—work:

1. The Offensive Iovator (e.g., Mike Yurcich, Oregon OC)

Pros:

Proven track record of developing QBs and high-powered offenses.
Familiarity with West Coast recruiting.
Could bring excitement back to a stagnant program.

Cons:

No head coaching experience (a risk for a program that needs stability).
May struggle with the CEO aspects of the job (fundraising, PR).

2. The Defensive Mind with West Coast Ties (e.g., Peter Sirmon, Oregon DC)

Pros:

Strong recruiter with California coections.
Defensive background could help against ACC’s physical offenses.

Cons:

Cal’s last defensive-minded coach (Wilcox) failed—will another fare better?
Offensive struggles would likely continue.

3. The Rising Star (e.g., Day Gonzales, New Mexico Head Coach)

Pros:

Head coaching experience (though at a lower level).
Strong recruiter with ties to California.
Could bring energy and a fresh approach.

Cons:

Never coached in a Power Five conference.
New Mexico’s recent struggles raise questions.

4. The Retread with a Chip on Their Shoulder (e.g., Chip Kelly, if UCLA fires him)

Pros:

Proven wier at Oregon (though his NFL and UCLA tenures were mixed).
Offensive iovator who could modernize Cal’s attack.
Knows how to win in California.

Cons:

Expensive (Cal may not be able to afford his salary).
Mixed recent results could scare off boosters.

—

Can Cal Football Return to Relevance? A Realistic Outlook

The Cal football coaching job is a high-risk, high-reward opportunity. The right hire could:

Leverage Cal’s academic prestige to attract high-character, high-IQ players who develop into NFL talent.
Turn the ACC’s chaos into an advantage by beating East Coast teams unprepared for West Coast speed.
Revitalize the fanbase and increase revenue through wiing.

But the wrong hire could lead to:

Further financial decline as losses mount.
A talent exodus to USC, Oregon, or Big Ten schools.
Irrelevance in a super-conference era where the gap between haves and have-nots widens.

The key? Stability. Cal hasn’t had a coach last more than seven seasons since Paddy Driscoll in the 1950s. The next hire must be given time, resources, and patience—something the program hasn’t always shown.

—

Final Verdict: Is the Cal Job a Dream or a Trap?

For the right coach, Cal is a sleeping giant. The Bay Area is a goldmine for talent, the academic brand is unmatched, and the ACC—despite its flaws—offers a path to Power Five relevance.

But for the wrong coach? It’s a career graveyard. The financial constraints, travel nightmares, and win-now pressure make this one of the toughest jobs in college football.

If Cal’s administration is serious about competing, they must:

Invest in facilities (even if it means cutting other sports).
Commit to the next coach for at least five years—no knee-jerk firings.
Leverage NIL and boosters to close the talent gap.
Embrace the ACC move as an opportunity, not a burden.

Otherwise, the Golden Bears risk becoming college football’s most interesting irrelevance—a program with endless potential but no path to realizing it.

—

What’s Next for Cal Football?

The 2024 season will be a crossroads. With a new coach (likely hired by early 2024) and a new conference, Cal has a chance to reinvent itself. Will they double down on offensive iovation? Prioritize defensive physicality to match the ACC? Or try to out-recruit the West Coast before the Big Ten fully takes over?

One thing is certain: the next chapter of Cal football will be one of the most fascinating stories in college sports. Whether it’s a phoenix rising or a cautionary tale remains to be seen.

What do you think? Is Cal a destination job or a rebuilding project? Who would be your top coaching candidate? Drop your thoughts in the comments—and if you’re a Cal fan, buckle up. The ride is just getting started.

Follow for more updates on the Cal football coaching search and the latest in college football realignment.

—

Tags: ACC football, Berkeley athletics, Cal Bears, Cal football, college football coaching jobs, college football finances, football recruiting, Justin Wilcox, NIL money, Pac-12 realignment, Power Five coaching

Kebun Firdaus