Trump Begins Process of Designating Muslim Brotherhood Chapters as Terrorist Groups: What It Means

November 24, 2025
Blog

Trump Begins Process of Designating Muslim Brotherhood Chapters as Terrorist Groups: What It Means

In a move that could reshape U.S. foreign policy and counterterrorism efforts, the Trump administration has initiated steps to designate certain chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations. This decision, long debated in political and security circles, carries significant implications for global diplomacy, national security, and civil liberties. But what does this designation entail, and why does it matter now?

This article explores the background of the Muslim Brotherhood, the legal and political process behind terrorist designations, and the potential consequences of this decision—both domestically and internationally. Whether you’re a policy analyst, a concerned citizen, or simply curious about geopolitical shifts, understanding this development is crucial in today’s intercoected world.

What Is the Muslim Brotherhood?

The Muslim Brotherhood (officially known as Jamāʻat al-Ikhwān al-Muslimūn) is a transnational Islamist organization founded in Egypt in 1928 by Hassan al-Baa. It advocates for a return to Islamic governance and has influenced political movements across the Middle East and beyond. While it operates as a political and social organization in some countries, its affiliates have been linked to extremist activities in others.

Key Facts About the Muslim Brotherhood

  • Founding Principle: The group seeks to establish governments based on Islamic law (Sharia) through gradual reform and political participation.
  • Global Reach: It has branches or affiliated groups in over 70 countries, including Hamas in Palestine and the Freedom and Justice Party in Egypt.
  • Controversial Status: Some nations, like Egypt and Saudi Arabia, classify it as a terrorist organization, while others, such as Qatar and Turkey, support its political activities.
  • U.S. Stance (Pre-2024): Previous administrations, including Obama’s and Biden’s, avoided a blanket terrorist designation due to its complex political and charitable activities.

The Brotherhood’s dual nature—as both a political entity and a movement with extremist offshoots—makes it a contentious subject in global counterterrorism discussions.

Why Designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a Terrorist Group Now?

The Trump administration’s push to label parts of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organizations stems from longstanding concerns about its ties to violent extremism. Here’s why this move is gaining traction:

1. National Security Concerns

Critics argue that the Muslim Brotherhood has served as an ideological incubator for more radical groups, including al-Qaeda and ISIS. By designating its chapters as terrorist entities, the U.S. aims to:

  • Disrupt financial networks that may fund extremist activities.
  • Limit the group’s ability to operate within the U.S. and allied nations.
  • Send a strong message to countries that harbor or support the Brotherhood.

2. Alignment with Regional Allies

Key U.S. allies in the Middle East, such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, have long pressed for this designation. These nations view the Brotherhood as a destabilizing force and have baed it domestically. By taking this step, the Trump administration aligns U.S. policy with these allies, potentially strengthening regional partnerships against Iran and other adversaries.

3. Political and Ideological Motivations

The decision also reflects a broader “America First” approach to foreign policy, prioritizing aggressive counterterrorism measures. Supporters argue that previous administrations were too cautious, allowing the Brotherhood to exploit legal loopholes to spread its influence.

Related: U.S. Counterterrorism Policies: A Historical Overview

How Does the Terrorist Designation Process Work?

Designating an organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) under U.S. law is a multi-step legal and administrative process. Here’s how it unfolds:

Step 1: Intelligence and Legal Review

The State Department, in coordination with the FBI, CIA, and Treasury Department, compiles evidence linking the group to terrorist activities. This includes:

  • Financial transactions supporting extremism.
  • Operational ties to designated terrorist groups.
  • Public statements or actions promoting violence.

Step 2: Presidential Authorization

The Secretary of State, with the President’s approval, formally proposes the designation. The administration must demonstrate that the group:

  • Engages in terrorist activity or terrorism.
  • Threatens U.S. national security or citizens.
  • Operates outside the U.S. (for FTO status).

Step 3: Congressional Notification

The State Department notifies Congress, which has seven days to review the decision. While Congress can block the designation with a joint resolution, this is rare due to the classified nature of the evidence.

Step 4: Public Aouncement and Implementation

Once finalized, the designation is published in the Federal Register, triggering legal consequences:

  • Asset Freezes: U.S. financial institutions must block the group’s assets.
  • Travel Bans: Members are barred from entering the U.S.
  • Criminal Penalties: Providing material support to the group becomes a felony, punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

See also: How the U.S. Designates Terrorist Organizations: A Step-by-Step Guide

Potential Impacts of the Designation

The decision to label Muslim Brotherhood chapters as terrorist groups could have far-reaching consequences. Here’s a breakdown of the key implications:

1. Strengthening Counterterrorism Efforts

Pros:

  • Disrupting Financing: Banks and governments can freeze assets linked to the Brotherhood, cutting off funding for extremist activities.
  • Deterring Recruitment: A terrorist label may discourage individuals from joining or supporting the group.
  • Enhancing Intelligence Sharing: Allied nations may increase cooperation in tracking Brotherhood-affiliated networks.

Cons:

  • Overbreadth Risks: The designation could ensnare humanitarian organizations or political groups with tenuous ties to the Brotherhood.
  • Legal Challenges: Courts may strike down the designation if evidence is deemed insufficient or overly broad.

2. Diplomatic Repercussions

Support from Allies: Countries like Egypt and the UAE will likely praise the move, seeing it as validation of their own policies. This could lead to:

  • Stronger counterterrorism partnerships in the Middle East.
  • Increased pressure on Qatar and Turkey, which have supported the Brotherhood.

Backlash from Critics: Nations and organizations that view the Brotherhood as a legitimate political movement may condemn the decision, leading to:

  • Strained relations with Turkey and Qatar.
  • Accusations of politicizing counterterrorism for domestic gains.

3. Domestic Controversies

Within the U.S., the designation could spark debates over:

  • Free Speech vs. Security: Critics argue it may chill legitimate political or religious expression among Muslim communities.
  • Legal Precedents: Civil liberties groups may challenge the designation in court, citing lack of due process.
  • Islamophobia Concerns: Some fear the move could fuel anti-Muslim sentiment, particularly if the designation is perceived as overly broad.

Related: Balancing Security and Civil Liberties in Counterterrorism

Real-World Examples: How Other Countries Handle the Muslim Brotherhood

The U.S. isn’t the first nation to grapple with the Muslim Brotherhood’s dual identity. Here’s how other countries have approached the group:

1. Egypt: Full Ban and Crackdown

Since the 2013 military coup that ousted President Mohamed Morsi (a Brotherhood leader), Egypt has:

  • Baed the group entirely, labeling it a terrorist organization.
  • Arrested thousands of members, including leaders and activists.
  • Seized assets and shut down affiliated charities and businesses.

Result: The Brotherhood’s political influence in Egypt has been severely weakened, but underground networks persist.

2. Saudi Arabia and UAE: Aggressive Suppression

Both nations classify the Brotherhood as a terrorist group and have:

  • Imprisoned members and sympathizers.
  • Pressured other countries to cut ties with the group.
  • Funded counter-messaging campaigns to undermine its ideology.

Result: The Brotherhood’s operations in the Gulf have been largely dismantled, but its ideology still resonates among some segments.

3. Qatar and Turkey: Support and Sanctuary

In contrast, Qatar and Turkey have provided the Brotherhood with:

  • Political Asylum: Many leaders, including those exiled from Egypt, reside in Doha and Istanbul.
  • Media Platforms: Chaels like Al Jazeera have amplified Brotherhood-affiliated voices.
  • Financial Backing: Qatar, in particular, has been accused of funding Brotherhood-linked groups.

Result: These nations have become hubs for Brotherhood activity, straining their relations with Egypt and the Gulf states.

What’s Next? Key Questions and Future Trends

The Trump administration’s push to designate Muslim Brotherhood chapters as terrorist groups raises several unanswered questions. Here’s what to watch for in the coming months:

1. Will the Designation Hold Up in Court?

Legal challenges are almost certain. Courts will scrutinize:

  • Whether the evidence sufficiently links the designated chapters to terrorism.
  • Whether the designation is overly broad, ensnaring non-violent affiliates.

Expert Take: “The government will need to present clear and convincing evidence of direct ties to terrorism,” says [Counterterrorism Law Expert]. “Vague associations won’t suffice.”

2. How Will Allied Nations Respond?

The decision could either:

  • Strengthen Alliances: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE may deepen counterterrorism cooperation with the U.S.
  • Strain Relations: Turkey and Qatar could retaliate by limiting intelligence sharing or increasing support for the Brotherhood.

3. What Does This Mean for U.S. Muslim Communities?

Civil rights groups warn of potential:

  • Increased Surveillance: Muslim Americans may face heightened scrutiny, particularly those with perceived ties to the Brotherhood.
  • Chilling Effect: Fear of prosecution could deter legitimate political or religious activities.

Community Response: Organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) have already vowed to challenge the designation, arguing it unfairly targets Muslims.

4. Could This Set a Precedent for Future Designations?

If successful, this move could embolden future administrations to designate other controversial groups, such as:

  • Far-right extremist organizations with global ties.
  • Foreign political parties accused of undermining U.S. interests.

Long-Term Impact: “This could lower the threshold for what constitutes a terrorist group,” notes [National Security Analyst]. “The ripple effects may reshape global counterterrorism norms.”

How to Stay Informed and Engaged

As this story develops, staying informed is key—whether you’re a policy wonk, a concerned citizen, or a journalist. Here’s how to follow the latest updates and take action:

1. Follow Reliable News Sources

Bookmark these outlets for balanced coverage:

  • Reuters and AP News for factual updates.
  • The Washington Post and The New York Times for in-depth analysis.
  • Al Jazeera and Middle East Eye for regional perspectives.

2. Track Official Government Aouncements

Monitor statements from:

3. Engage with Advocacy Groups

If you’re concerned about civil liberties or national security, consider coecting with:

  • CAIR (cair.com) for Muslim community perspectives.
  • ACLU (aclu.org) for legal and constitutional analysis.
  • Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD) (fdd.org) for counterterrorism insights.

4. Participate in Public Discourse

Share your views responsibly by: